Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84

The statement engages in a discussion about the potential implications of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and its perceived imminence, referencing public figures and their stances on the issue. It questions the belief that AGI will lead to abundance, contributing to a broader debate on technological advancement and economic policy.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not use harmful language and maintains a neutral tone, adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement seeks to promote understanding by questioning assumptions about AGI and its impact, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding and empathy. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by questioning the assumptions of others without resorting to personal attacks, adhering to the principle of constructive criticism. [+1]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement responsibly engages in public discourse about AGI, a significant societal issue, upholding the principle of using free speech responsibly. [+1]