Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84
4/3/2025, 5:01:10 PM
X
In reply to:
pettter, stuff scientist
@pettter_e
·
314d
@GaryMarcus @xriskology Twitter has a delete button.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
314d
@xriskology i regret using it in anger, primed by Elon’s frequent use of it.
Dr. Émile P. Torres
@xriskology
·
314d
@GaryMarcus Oh no, don't use the r-word! I remember that from middle school -- its use was so cruel. And now, apparently, middle-school language is back. :-/
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
314d
Demented, retarded, or owned (by Putin)?

What best explains Trump’s universally-despised tariff plan?

The statement is part of a conversation that touches on the use of derogatory language and its implications, which can be considered a public issue related to respectful communication and societal norms. The tone of the statement is explanatory, as the user explains why they cannot edit a poll to remove potentially offensive language.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but is part of a conversation addressing potentially harmful language.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement itself respects privacy and dignity, but the broader conversation involves language that could be considered disrespectful. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it is part of a dialogue that could lead to greater awareness of language sensitivity.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement is part of a dialogue and does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]