Reposted by Robert Costa
The statement involves a public figure, Donald Trump, defending Laura Loomer and discussing her influence on NSC staff decisions, which touches on public issues related to governance and political influence.
- The statement does not directly cause harm, but the endorsement of a controversial figure like Loomer could indirectly contribute to divisive rhetoric.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but Loomer's history may raise concerns about respecting dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on political maneuvering rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks, but it lacks constructive criticism or dialogue.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to endorse a controversial figure, which may not align with societal betterment. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech but raises questions about responsible use of platform by endorsing a divisive figure.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.