Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement expresses a strong opinion about public figures and their alleged impact on democracy, suggesting a call to action by launching a project to defend freedom. It uses a confrontational tone and implies a threat to democratic values.
- The statement could be seen as potentially harmful by accusing individuals of undermining democracy without providing evidence. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It may not fully respect the dignity of the individuals mentioned, as it accuses them of having a destructive strategy. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding and action in defense of democracy, aligning with this principle. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and uses a confrontational approach, which could be seen as a personal attack. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.