In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
312d
The statement and conversation involve a discussion on free speech, disinformation, and accountability, which are public issues. The tone is confrontational, with accusations of dishonesty and misrepresentation. The statement critiques the role of propaganda in inciting violence and shifts blame from individuals to those spreading misinformation.
- The statement partially adheres to the principle of doing no harm by focusing on the role of propaganda rather than individuals, but the confrontational tone may incite further conflict.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement challenges the privacy and dignity of those accused of spreading propaganda, potentially leading to harassment. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it is accusatory and lacks constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in personal attacks, reducing the potential for constructive criticism and dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.