In reply to:
Smoke Σ𝕏
@SmokeEx
·
312d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
312d
The statement is part of a heated discussion about free speech and accountability for spreading propaganda. The tone is confrontational and dismissive, using derogatory language. The intent seems to be to clarify a misunderstanding about the focus of criticism, shifting it from firebombers to those spreading propaganda.
- The use of derogatory language violates the principle of doing no harm with words. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others, engaging in a personal attack. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote constructive dialogue, instead using an ad hominem approach. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.