Marianne Williamson

Rank 17 of 47
|
Score 63
4/4/2025, 12:01:56 PM
X
In reply to:
Hoodie James Harrison
@hoodieslvrback
·
116d
@marwilliamson And I would love to hear you explain “the secret to salvation is this: you are doing this to yourself” on this platform. “No matter what the form of attack!” To be influential politically, we must Return To Love. Not peddle fear.
Hoodie James Harrison
@hoodieslvrback
·
116d
@marwilliamson With all due respect, you are fostering level confusion by saying “He has traumatized so many people, creating panic about their money, jobs, their ability to survive” which suggests that physical experiences are our source of peace. ACIM tells us peace comes from spirit alone.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
116d
@hoodieslvrback That’s not an alternative; it’s simply describing the metaphysical truth behind it all. ACIM would say not to foster level confusion. Are you under the impression that being a student of the course of miracles means we have no capacity to set boundaries, or say no? There’s
Hoodie James Harrison
@hoodieslvrback
·
116d
@marwilliamson Alternatively, a healthy and sincere practitioner of A Course In Miracles would explain to all her followers that love holds no grievances and that the secret to salvation is that we all do this to ourselves.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
116d
He has traumatized so many people, creating panic about their money, their jobs, their very ability to survive.

A healthy country would have only one response to this: "How f---ing dare you." 2/2
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
116d
He is carelessly inflicting pain. The fact that anyone is okay with this - justifying it, being complacent about it or failing to care - is more dangerous than anything he is specifically doing. 1/2

The statement engages in a public discourse about the interpretation of 'A Course in Miracles' and its application to societal issues, specifically addressing the concept of fear and injustice. The tone is analytical and seeks to clarify a misunderstanding in the interpretation of a philosophical text in the context of public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and instead seeks to clarify a misunderstanding, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by addressing a misinterpretation and providing an analogy to explain its point, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding and empathy. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a disagreement without resorting to personal attacks, aligning with the principle of engaging in constructive criticism. [+1]