Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84
4/4/2025, 4:33:14 PM
X
In reply to:
Peter Wildeford 馃嚭馃嚫馃殌
@peterwildeford
路
311d
@GaryMarcus Tesla manufactures domestically but imports a lot of parts... Same for SpaceX

No one is spared
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
路
311d
@peterwildeford Yep, but more on rep and poor sales than the tariffs? In principle they should be less affected by the tariffs than their competitors.

In any case Elon has stood by this insane policy, not commenting on its idiocy.
Peter Wildeford 馃嚭馃嚫馃殌
@peterwildeford
路
311d
@GaryMarcus TSLA down 36.23% YTD
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
路
313d
The fact that Elon is standing by Trump when Trump has unleashed one of the worst economic policies in history tells us roughly two things
- Elon is no genius
- Elon cares only about power and impact on his own companies and nothing else

The statement is part of a public discourse discussing Elon Musk's stance on economic policies, specifically tariffs, and their impact on companies like Tesla and SpaceX. The tone is critical, questioning why Elon Musk hasn't spoken against the policies.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but uses strong language ('insane') to describe the situation, which could be seen as inflammatory.聽[-1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on criticism without offering constructive dialogue.聽[-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism but does not provide constructive dialogue or solutions, and it indirectly questions Elon Musk's actions without personal attacks.
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech by questioning a public figure's actions, but it could be more responsible by offering a more balanced view.