The statement addresses the role of judges in upholding the Constitution and criticizes political threats against them, which constitutes public discourse as it engages with issues of judicial independence and political pressure.
- The statement does not use harmful language but rather focuses on the importance of judicial independence. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding of the judicial role and the importance of constitutional adherence. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement criticizes political actions but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to highlight the importance of judicial independence, contributing to societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly discussing judicial and political issues. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.