Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84
4/5/2025, 2:00:21 AM
X
In reply to:
RyanRejoice
@sonicshifts
·
309d
@dwarkesh_sp so @GaryMarcus and who else
Dwarkesh Patel
@dwarkesh_sp
·
310d
In 2 weeks, I’m going to be releasing an episode with 2 guests who have 2045+ timelines, are skeptical of the whole “alignment” framework, and don’t think an intelligence explosion is plausible.

The statement is a response in a conversation about a podcast episode featuring guests with specific views on AI timelines and skepticism about certain frameworks. The reply suggests that the speaker's skepticism might not be welcome on the podcast, hinting at a perceived exclusion from the discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm with words or actions, as it simply expresses a personal view on being potentially unwelcome. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on a personal perception of exclusion.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it does imply a critique of the podcast's openness to diverse viewpoints. [+1]