neil turkewitz
@neilturkewitz
·
308d
The statement expresses a personal grievance against Sam Altman, accusing him of dishonesty during a Senate testimony. It reflects frustration over AI companies' handling of intellectual property rights, particularly regarding creators' control over their work. The tone is accusatory and critical, focusing on perceived deception and lack of transparency.
- The statement could potentially harm reputations by accusing someone of lying, which may not align with striving to do no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of the individual it accuses, potentially engaging in a form of public shaming. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, instead opting for a personal attack without offering a solution or engaging in a broader discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.