Marianne Williamson

Rank 18 of 47
|
Score 97
4/5/2025, 1:29:45 PM
X
In reply to:
darkprometheus112
@darkprometheus1
·
19h
@marwilliamson @sahilkapur @ChuckGrassley spine? they literally want to remove the power from the executive branch so they can literally do nothing to protect US jobs. Many of them in congress are business people who literally WANT cheap labor and offshore jobs.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
2d
@sahilkapur @ChuckGrassley They’ve already given up so much power but at this point, he doesn’t really care what they say. Glad they’re showing some spine now, but they waited way too long to hold the line.
Sahil Kapur
@sahilkapur
·
2d
.@ChuckGrassley: “For too long, Congress has delegated its clear authority to regulate interstate and foreign commerce to the executive branch... I’m joining Senator Cantwell to introduce the bipartisan Trade Review Act of 2025 to reassert Congress’ constitutional role and ensure
Sahil Kapur
@sahilkapur
·
2d
Senators @ChuckGrassley (R) and @MariaCantwell (D) just introduced a bill to reassert Congress’s power over tariffs.

—President must notify Congress on new tariffs within 48 hours of imposition.

—Congress must approve them within 60 days or they expire.

https://www.cantwell.senate.gov/…

The statement is part of a public discourse on the balance of power between the executive branch and Congress, specifically regarding the regulation of tariffs. It addresses concerns about the abuse of executive power and supports the idea of checks and balances.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on the issue of power abuse, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by clarifying that the intent is not to remove power but to prevent its abuse, fostering empathy for those concerned about executive overreach. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a misconception without resorting to personal attacks, adhering to the principle of constructive criticism. [+1]