In reply to:
Jade Cole
@JadeCole2112
·
308d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
308d
neil turkewitz
@neilturkewitz
·
308d
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the legal and ethical implications of AI companies using copyrighted material without compensation. It references the need for legal oversight and expert opinion on corporate law, particularly in the context of AI companies transitioning to for-profit models and the role of attorney generals in determining compensation frameworks.
- The statement strives to do no harm by focusing on legal processes and expert opinions, promoting a structured approach to resolving compensation issues. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy and dignity by not engaging in personal attacks or revealing private information, focusing instead on legal and corporate processes. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by referencing expert opinions and legal requirements, encouraging informed discussion on the topic. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in constructive dialogue by suggesting the involvement of legal experts and attorney generals, avoiding personal attacks and focusing on systemic solutions. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.