Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84
4/5/2025, 1:52:49 PM
X
In reply to:
Dagan Shani
@daganshani1
·
308d
@GaryMarcus Yeah, that was the stated goal of OpenAI, that's why what happened afterwards with the for-profit and rushing forward with it is so problematic.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
308d
@daganshani1 This alone is incredible. I had not seen it:
Dagan Shani
@daganshani1
·
308d
@GaryMarcus Back then, I had just finished the trailer for a non-existing film "Don't Look Up - The Documentary" (the first 2:45 seconds of the film) and wanted to upload it to the net. But then I saw how Sam played Blumenthal, so I ended up making a 17-minute film:
Dagan Shani
@daganshani1
·
976d
Don't Look Up - The Documentary: The Case For AI As An Existential Threat.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
308d
I was there. And I will never forget how Sam played me and the Senate by lying about so many things to our faces.
neil turkewitz
@neilturkewitz
·
308d
Altman’s 2023 Congressional testimony:
“We think that creators deserve control over how their creations are used & what happens sort of beyond the point of them releasing it into the world.”
https://www.digitalmusicnews.com…

@kortizart @ednewtonrex @jason_kint @GaryMarcus

The statement is part of a broader discussion about OpenAI's goals and actions, particularly regarding its transition to a for-profit model and its implications. The conversation touches on public concerns about AI development, transparency, and ethical considerations.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and seeks information to understand the context better. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by seeking clarification and further information. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by asking for sources to verify claims. [+1]