In reply to:
None of These Candidates
@quarter_n_dime
·
16h
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
16h
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the implications of the 2017 Trump tax cut, critiquing its benefits to the wealthy and its impact on government spending. It contributes to a broader discussion on economic policy and wealth distribution.
- The statement does not use harmful language but rather critiques a policy, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement aims to promote understanding of economic disparities and the impact of tax policies, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding and empathy. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of a policy without resorting to personal attacks, aligning with the principle of constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By critiquing a policy that affects societal wealth distribution, the statement uses influence for societal betterment, aligning with this principle. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement responsibly uses free speech to critique a public policy, aligning with the principle of responsible platform use. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.