Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing public issues related to the statements and policies of a public figure, Donald Trump, particularly in the context of history, economics, and trade.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language like 'utterly deluded' and 'flat-out nonsense,' which could be seen as harmful or disrespectful, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm with words. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does use harsh language that could be seen as disrespectful.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on criticizing without offering constructive dialogue or solutions. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism but does not appear to offer constructive dialogue or avoid personal attacks, as it labels Trump's assertions as 'nonsense' without further explanation or engagement. [-1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by critiquing a public figure's statements, but the use of strong language may not reflect responsible use of the platform.