Marianne Williamson

Rank 18 of 47
|
Score 97
4/5/2025, 2:22:44 PM
X
In reply to:
The Matrix Storm
@TheMatrixStorm
·
16h
@marwilliamson @quarter_n_dime Lowering tax rates increases total revenues within the range you are talking about.

That's facts. Not a debate.

Get off the debate stage if you can't think counterintuitively or bring facts to support your ideology.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
16h
@quarter_n_dime I think it's awful - which is why the 2017 Trump tax cut they want to extend - which gives 83 cents of every dollar to the richest corporations and individuals and will cost us trillions over the next few years - is so egregious. They say the uber rich are the "job creators"
None of These Candidates
@quarter_n_dime
·
17h
@marwilliamson What are your thoughts on the government spending twice as much as they bring in?
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
17h
I understand the rage people in this country have felt for decades - not just the sense but the certainty that the system was rigged against them. That’s why I was always such a big supporter of Bernie Sanders. We deserve universal healthcare, like in every other advanced

The statement is part of a public discourse on tax policy and wealth distribution, engaging in a debate about the effects of tax breaks on wealth hoarding and revenue generation.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but uses a dismissive tone, which could be seen as unconstructive. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it dismisses the possibility of debate. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it dismisses the opposing view as 'not a debate.' [-2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech but does not use the platform to foster constructive dialogue.