In reply to:
Levon H
@I_mWithTheBand
·
41d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
41d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of government subsidies and the distribution of taxpayer money, critiquing the allocation of funds to wealthy individuals rather than those in need. It references a quote by Martin Luther King Jr. to emphasize the perceived inequality in how financial aid is labeled and distributed.
- The statement does not directly harm others but uses strong language to critique economic policies.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does use a dismissive tone towards certain political figures. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement attempts to promote understanding of economic disparities and the misuse of taxpayer money. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of economic policies but includes a personal attack by labeling Sanders as 'pinko' and using 'Marxist rhetoric,' which detracts from constructive dialogue. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to highlight perceived economic injustices, aiming to influence public opinion on government spending. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech to critique public policy, though the tone could be more respectful to uphold integrity.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.