Jill Stien

Rank 42 of 47
|
Score -114

The statement questions the alignment of an 'anti-oligarchy' tour with the Democratic party, suggesting a contradiction due to the party's alleged ties to big money. It critiques the effectiveness of the Democratic party as a solution to oligarchic issues, implying skepticism about its integrity in addressing money in politics.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm but implies criticism of the Democratic party's integrity.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It challenges the party's stance on oligarchy, potentially promoting critical thinking about political solutions. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism but does not resort to personal attacks, focusing on the party's actions. [+1]