Jill Stien

Rank 42 of 47
|
Score -114

The statement critiques the Democratic Party's actions regarding the minimum wage, suggesting inconsistency between their actions when in power versus when out of power. It references a conversation about a recent Senate vote on a minimum wage amendment, highlighting a perceived discrepancy in political behavior.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but implies criticism of political actions, which is a common aspect of public discourse.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on criticizing a political party's actions without offering constructive dialogue or solutions. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism of a political party but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, maintaining a focus on political actions.
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech and uses the platform to critique political actions, which is a responsible use of free speech in a democratic society. [+1]