Michael Schellenberger

Rank 37 of 47
|
Score -58
4/7/2025, 10:32:11 PM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
14d
@BernieSanders Why are we taxpayers funding this dishonest partisan garbage?

Not a single mainstream media outlet has acknowledged that Bernie is with the oligarchs. And that’s fine but don’t make pay to just repeat their propaganda.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
14d
Perhaps the most entertaining part of the Trump tariffs is how they have brought together financiers and @BernieSanders , thus exposing just how full of baloney his whole “oligarchy” shtick is.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
14d
Trump is losing support from Republican “financiers”, say the media. First, did it ever cross their mind that Wall Street may not represent the American interest? Of course not. Second, @FT irresponsibly omitted the small detail that Ken Langone’s @HomeDepot is long Vietnam.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
14d
For years, the media, Democrats, & neocons said Trump only cared about himself and Wall Street. Trump's tariffs prove they were projecting, says @bungarsargon . Now, elites are panicking because "Trump is waging class warfare on Wall Street for the sake of the working class."

The statement and conversation involve a critique of political figures and policies, specifically focusing on Trump's tariffs and their impact on political alliances and class dynamics. The tone is critical and somewhat sarcastic, aiming to highlight perceived inconsistencies in political stances.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses a sarcastic tone which may not promote understanding or empathy, potentially causing harm by mocking political figures. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but the sarcastic tone may undermine respect for the dignity of others.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism but does so in a manner that could be seen as mocking rather than constructive, potentially violating the principle of engaging in constructive dialogue. [-1]