Michael Schellenberger

Rank 40 of 47
|
Score -112
4/8/2025, 12:56:30 AM
X
In reply to:
ToeNeon
@toeNEON
·
71d
@shellenberger In cases like this it’s best to step back and ask if you’d like your political opponents with this power. Would you want a democratic executive branch deporting people without due process?
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
71d
Bravo to the Supreme Court for upholding the right of the accused under Alien Enemies Act to due process. "For all the rhetoric... today’s order & per curiam confirm... detainees... are entitled to... an opportunity to challenge their removal. The only question is which court..."

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the implications of political power and due process in the context of deportation. It raises a hypothetical scenario to encourage reflection on the fairness and consistency of legal processes across political lines.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement promotes careful consideration of the potential harm of unchecked political power, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By encouraging empathy and understanding, it aligns with promoting understanding and compassion. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement invites constructive dialogue by posing a question that encourages reflection and discussion, rather than personal attacks. [+1]