Reposted by Robert Costa
The statement by the White House press secretary addresses a public issue related to transparency in government communication and public disagreements, which constitutes public discourse. The tone is dismissive and somewhat defensive, aiming to highlight the administration's transparency while reacting to a derogatory comment made by Elon Musk about Peter Navarro.
- The statement does not directly cause harm, but it dismisses a potentially harmful comment without addressing its impact, which could be seen as a minor oversight.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does not condemn the derogatory language used by Elon Musk, which could be seen as a missed opportunity to uphold dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it dismisses the derogatory comment without fostering a more constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it dismisses the comment rather than addressing it thoughtfully. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech by acknowledging public disagreements, but it could use its platform more responsibly by promoting a more respectful discourse.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.