Michael Schellenberger

Rank 40 of 47
|
Score -94

The statement discusses the predictors of justifying violence, linking them to political identity and ideology, specifically Left-Wing Authoritarianism (LWA). It suggests that time spent on BlueSky is also a significant predictor. The conversation involves a serious public issue regarding the justification of violence against public figures, which is a matter of public concern.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement could potentially harm by suggesting a link between political identity and justification of violence, which might reinforce stereotypes or biases. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy but could be seen as contributing to divisive discourse by associating political identity with violent attitudes. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on linking political identity to violence without offering solutions or deeper insights. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism of certain political ideologies but does not engage in personal attacks.