The statement critiques a nominee's response during a Senate hearing, suggesting evasiveness. It engages in public discourse by discussing accountability and transparency in government appointments.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement implies a lack of transparency, which could be seen as harmful to public trust.
[-1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement critiques the nominee's behavior without engaging in personal attacks, focusing on the content of the response.
[+1]