Rashida Tlaib

Rank 4 of 47

Score 197

-3

We cannot allow the Trump Administration to end our constitutional rights. The right to free speech obviously includes the right to protest the Israeli government’s genocide of Palestinians.

This fascism won’t end with Mahmoud Khalil. It’s a threat to all of us.

Camilo Montoya-Galvez

@camiloreports

78d

BREAKING — An immigration judge in Louisiana has allowed the Trump administration to move forward with its effort to deport Columbia activist Mahmoud Khalil, saying the determination that he poses “adverse foreign policy consequences” for the U.S. is “facially reasonable.”

4/11/2025, 8:39:48 PM

The statement expresses strong opposition to the Trump Administration's actions regarding constitutional rights and the deportation of Mahmoud Khalil. It uses charged language to criticize the administration and highlight concerns about free speech and protest rights, particularly in relation to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement uses strong language that could be seen as inflammatory, potentially causing harm by escalating tensions. This partially violates the principle of doing no harm. [-1]
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but the use of the term 'genocide' could be seen as provocative and disrespectful to some, potentially infringing on the dignity of others. [-1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it uses divisive language rather than fostering dialogue. [-1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead using strong language that could be seen as a personal attack on the Trump Administration. [-1]
Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
The statement attempts to use influence to raise awareness about perceived threats to constitutional rights, aligning with the principle of using influence for societal betterment. [+1]
Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
The statement upholds free speech by expressing a strong opinion on a public issue, but the responsibility and integrity of the platform are questionable due to the inflammatory language used.