Reposted by Andrew Yang🧢⬆️🇺🇸
The statement reflects the entrepreneur's frustration with the impact of tariffs on their business, highlighting a lack of public understanding and policy awareness. It addresses a public issue related to economic policy and its effects on businesses, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement does not directly harm others but expresses frustration, which could be seen as indirectly critical of those uninformed about tariffs.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement lacks empathy and compassion, focusing more on frustration than promoting understanding. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue or criticism but rather expresses a personal grievance without inviting discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the entrepreneur's experience to highlight a public issue, potentially raising awareness about the impact of tariffs. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech but could use the platform more responsibly by fostering dialogue rather than expressing frustration.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.