Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84
4/13/2025, 9:49:55 PM
X
In reply to:
Dianne Whitehead
@diannew314159
·
298d
@GaryMarcus And who could have seen this coming? 🤦‍♀️
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
298d
We are all fucked.

Thank you, POTUS, for giving China an excuse to shut down the export of rare earth minerals and magnets, furthering your efforts to drive us all back to the Stone Age.
Spencer Hakimian
@SpencerHakimian
·
298d
China choosing to escalate rather than deescalate.

China has a near universal monopoly on rare earth minerals needed for essentially all modern manufacturing.

This is a major problem.

The statement is a sarcastic response to a discussion about geopolitical tensions and their economic implications. It implies that the outcome was predictable and criticizes those who failed to foresee it.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses sarcasm, which can be seen as dismissive and potentially harmful, reducing understanding and empathy. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of others, as it implies a lack of intelligence in those who did not foresee the situation. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead uses a personal attack. [-1]