Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84

The statement suggests a warning about potential government overreach and suppression of dissent in the United States, drawing a parallel to an incident in China. It implies that similar events could occur in the U.S., urging vigilance.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement raises awareness about potential threats to freedom of speech, aligning with the principle of doing no harm by promoting vigilance. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It encourages understanding and empathy by highlighting the importance of being aware of governmental actions. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks but rather focuses on a broader societal issue, aligning with constructive dialogue. [+1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    By warning about potential threats to freedom, it uses influence to promote societal awareness. [+1]