Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84
4/14/2025, 2:20:49 PM
X
In reply to:
Market Observer
@Market0bserver8
·
297d
@GaryMarcus Your Constitution's first amendment protects against that from happening. If that can happen in U.S, then the rule of law is gone.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
297d
Anyone who think this can’t happen in the new United States isn’t paying attention.
Zyan
@ZyanBizBoost
·
298d
This billionaire criticized China’s government.

Then he vanished for 3 months.

When he returned, he had lost:

- $40 billion
- His powerful voice
- Control of his company, Alibaba

Here’s the story of the strange disappearance of the Chinese Jeff Bezos:

The conversation involves a discussion about freedom of speech and the rule of law, referencing a situation in China and its potential implications in the U.S. The statement by @Market0bserver8 suggests concern about the erosion of legal protections in the U.S., which is a substantive engagement with public issues.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement raises awareness about potential threats to legal protections, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The conversation respects privacy and dignity, focusing on public figures and issues rather than personal attacks. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by drawing parallels between international and domestic issues. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The dialogue is constructive, engaging with differing views without personal attacks. [+1]