Gary Marcus

Rank 11 of 47
|
Score 83
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
296d
these aren’t even digital 🤦‍♂️
4/14/2025, 4:18:17 PM
X
In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
296d
Dear @MarioNawfal, I call bullshit on the rumor you just shared that “Marcus problems” (whatever that means) have been fully solved by Grok 3.

It took me 30 seconds to find a slight variation on one of my former problems that still stymied Grok 3.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
296d
@AlexanderNaume2 “horse riding astronaut” is not solved in general form; i just tried this slight variation and Grok was 0 for 4.

The statement is part of a technical discussion about the capabilities of AI models in solving specific problems. It challenges a claim about the AI's performance, suggesting that a slight variation of a problem remains unsolved. The tone is critical but focused on the technical aspects.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and is focused on a technical critique. [+1]
  2. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by pointing out a specific issue with the AI's performance. [+1]