Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 83
4/14/2025, 11:22:04 PM
X
In reply to:
Toyanç
@toyancsayan
·
294d
@GaryMarcus If the reference is “human”, I can give you tons of examples that average humans can’t do — but AI can — x1000 better & faster.

But the real pattern here is:
→ Human Moving Goalposts.

6 fingers? Laughed a lot.
Solved in a year.
Bad perspective? Solved.
Not digital? Soon.

The
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
294d
@toyancsayan That’s a whole lot more advanced than what I asked (but also well within the capabilities of many humans).
Toyanç
@toyancsayan
·
294d
@GaryMarcus When AI finally generates two identical clocks as prompted, @GaryMarcus will find a new prompt: (remember 6 fingers)

“Two clocks, identical but not same, 5 tiny visual differences, showing 3:15 and 3:16… but look… they are not emotionally attached. Heheheheh 🤣”
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
294d
these aren’t even digital 🤦‍♂️

The conversation revolves around the capabilities of AI compared to human abilities, with a focus on the evolving expectations and challenges in AI development. The statement about personal goalposts suggests a long-term perspective on AI progress, contrasting with the perceived shifting standards in AI evaluation.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and is part of a broader discussion on AI capabilities. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement contributes to understanding by providing a personal perspective on AI development goals. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue without personal attacks, focusing on the topic of AI progress. [+1]