Reposted by Gary Marcus
Todor Markov
@todor_m_markov
·
297d
The statement and the accompanying conversation constitute public discourse as they engage with a public issue concerning the governance and control of OpenAI, a significant entity in the tech industry. The statement raises concerns about the potential shift in control from a non-profit to a for-profit model, which has implications for the organization's mission and societal impact.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it raises concerns about potential harm to the non-profit's mission, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on organizational issues rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By highlighting concerns about the organization's mission, the statement promotes understanding and awareness of the potential impact on society. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of OpenAI's governance, avoiding personal attacks and focusing on organizational issues. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to raise awareness about a significant public issue, aiming for the betterment of society by advocating for the non-profit's control. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly using the platform to discuss governance issues at OpenAI. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.