Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement critiques a political figure's actions, suggesting they resemble dictatorial powers, and links to a blog discussing authoritarianism. It engages with public issues related to governance and civil liberties.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as inflammatory, potentially causing harm by escalating tensions. It does not strive to do no harm, as it could contribute to divisive discourse. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does make a strong accusation against a public figure, which could be seen as disrespectful if not substantiated.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses charged language without offering a constructive dialogue or solution. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it makes a strong accusation without inviting discussion or providing evidence within the statement itself. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech by critiquing a public figure, but the responsibility and integrity of the platform depend on the context and evidence provided in the linked article.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.