In reply to:
John Borman
@john4zoyrunning
·
13d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the actions of the Trump administration and their implications for civil rights and the protection of Jewish students, which are public issues. The tone is critical and suggests that the administration's actions are not genuinely aimed at protecting Jewish students.
- The statement does not use harmful language but criticizes the administration's actions, suggesting a failure to protect Jewish students.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of others and does not engage in hate speech or harassment.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement attempts to promote understanding by highlighting perceived inconsistencies in the administration's actions. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of the administration's policies without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to question government actions, potentially contributing to societal betterment by encouraging scrutiny of public policies. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly critiquing government actions. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.