Gary Marcus

Rank 10 of 47
|
Score 118
4/16/2025, 12:38:30 PM
X
In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
路
95d
@peterwildeford They are still a serious problem.

Reasoning is still a serious problem.

Planning is still a serious problem.

Reliability is still a serious problem.

Full abstraction is still a serious problem.

Deep semantics still seems lacking.

I still see no principled solutions to any
Peter Wildeford 馃嚭馃嚫馃殌
@peterwildeford
路
95d
@GaryMarcus what's a key issue you care about?

E.g., hallucinations aren't 0 but are down significantly
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
路
95d
@peterwildeford I don鈥檛 see qualitative change on any of the issues I care about, just training to benchmarks.
Peter Wildeford 馃嚭馃嚫馃殌
@peterwildeford
路
95d
@GaryMarcus > it still has the same old issues with X, Y, and Z

X, Y, Z keep changing and getting smaller with every release though? don't get frog boiled
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
路
95d
Who could have foreseen this?
Haider.
@slow_developer
路
96d
every time openAI releases a new model:

5 minutes after release: look at the performance on these benchmarks. this is incredible

3 days later: hmm, it's a good model, but it still has the same old issues with X, Y, and Z

1 week later: it was a big disappointment. when is the

The statement by @peterwildeford engages in a discussion about the limitations and challenges of AI models, specifically addressing issues like reasoning, planning, and reliability. This constitutes public discourse as it involves substantive engagement with technological and societal issues related to AI development.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on discussing the limitations of AI models, adhering to the principle of doing no harm.聽[+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote understanding by discussing the limitations of AI models, which can foster empathy and compassion for those working to improve these technologies.聽[+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing the issues raised by others without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.聽[+1]