Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the political views of public figures on the issue of Israel and Palestine, and it references a specific incident involving an arsonist's motive against a political figure. The tone is somewhat sarcastic and critical, particularly towards those who singled out Shapiro for his views on Israel.
- The statement does not directly cause harm, but the sarcastic tone could contribute to a divisive atmosphere, which may indirectly cause harm by escalating tensions. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does mention a sensitive topic that could affect the dignity of those involved.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it uses sarcasm, which may hinder constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it does not foster constructive criticism or dialogue either.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.