Gary Marcus

Rank 10 of 47
|
Score 122

The statement expresses a strong negative opinion about the impact of tariffs on the US-China relationship and potential economic consequences. It uses harsh language and a critical tone towards a public figure, suggesting a significant disagreement with the policy decision.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses harsh language, which could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, violating the principle of doing no harm. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The use of explicit language and personal attack does not respect the dignity of others, violating the principle of respecting privacy and dignity. [-2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism and instead uses a personal attack, violating the principle of engaging in constructive dialogue. [-2]