Gary Marcus

The statement is part of a discussion on the economic implications of trade policies between the US and China, suggesting that these actions could lead to an 'economic WW3.'

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement uses hyperbolic language ('economic WW3') which could be seen as alarmist, potentially causing unnecessary fear or misunderstanding. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The language used in the conversation ('fuck the US') is disrespectful and could be considered as not upholding the dignity of others involved in the discourse. [-2]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on a negative outcome without offering constructive dialogue or solutions. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement lacks constructive criticism and instead uses inflammatory language, which does not foster productive dialogue. [-2]