Gary Marcus

Rank 16 of 47
|
Score 93

The statement critiques the progress of driverless cars, suggesting skepticism about technological advancements despite ongoing efforts. It engages in public discourse by addressing the broader issue of technological progress and its practical availability.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm but expresses skepticism about technological progress.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It does not promote understanding or empathy but highlights a perceived gap between progress and practical application. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the real-world impact of technological advancements. [+1]