Gary Marcus

Rank 15 of 47
|
Score 103
Transluce
@TransluceAI
·
43d
We tested a pre-release version of o3 and found that it frequently fabricates actions it never took, and then elaborately justifies these actions when confronted.

We were surprised, so we dug deeper 🔎🧵(1/)
4/16/2025, 8:59:10 PM
X
In reply to:
⋔ echo_name↓
@duluhagv
·
43d
@GaryMarcus @tylercowen have you tried the model yet sir?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
43d
Tyler Cowen @tylercowen is claiming (without giving a real definition) that o3 is AGI.

I guarantee his claim won’t stand the test of time, and in 5 years people will laugh at the idea that o3 was AGI.

As Mollick (and I) have noted o3 is just not going to be systematically
Ethan Mollick
@emollick
·
43d
Interesting argument from @tylercowen.

Is o3 good enough to be AGI? The counter argument might force us to wait until ASI, because only then will an AI definitively outperform all humans at all tasks. In the meantime we have a Jagged AGI, with subhuman & superhuman abilities.

The statement is part of a broader discussion on whether the AI model 'o3' qualifies as AGI (Artificial General Intelligence). It involves multiple viewpoints, including skepticism about the model's capabilities and the potential for it to be considered AGI. The conversation touches on public discourse about AI development and its implications.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The discussion is generally respectful and does not appear to cause harm, though it involves critical analysis of claims about AGI. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The conversation promotes understanding by engaging with different perspectives on AGI, encouraging a deeper exploration of what constitutes AGI. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The dialogue includes constructive criticism, particularly in questioning the claims about o3 being AGI, without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]