Gary Marcus

The statement engages in a discussion about the capabilities of artificial general intelligence (AGI) in relation to human mathematical performance. It questions the threshold for AGI by comparing it to median human mathematical abilities, suggesting that surpassing this level is not a significant challenge for AGI. The tone is analytical and somewhat skeptical, aiming to contribute to the debate on what constitutes AGI.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not use harmful language and maintains a neutral tone, adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
2. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement promotes understanding by engaging in a discussion about AGI capabilities, contributing to a broader understanding of the topic. [+1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive dialogue by questioning and analyzing the criteria for AGI without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]
4. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly contributing to a public debate on AGI, using the platform to discuss a relevant societal issue. [+1]