Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement critiques overly optimistic predictions about AI capabilities, comparing them to past exaggerated claims. It uses sarcasm and historical references to highlight perceived inaccuracies and unrealistic expectations. The tone is skeptical and critical, aiming to question the reliability of such predictions.
- The statement uses sarcasm and historical comparisons, which may not directly harm but could be seen as dismissive. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement engages in criticism of AI predictions but does not engage in personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.