Gary Marcus

The statement is part of a conversation about the concept of agency in AI systems, which is a public issue related to technology and its implications. The tone is somewhat critical and dismissive, suggesting that planning is inadequate compared to independent action, which could be concerning.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly cause harm, but the dismissive tone towards planning could be seen as undermining constructive dialogue, resulting in a minor violation. [-1]
2. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it dismisses a viewpoint without elaboration, resulting in a minor violation. [-1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in a form of critique but does not provide constructive criticism or dialogue, and the dismissive tone could be seen as a minor personal attack, resulting in a minor violation. [-1]