In reply to:
Raul Izahi Lopez
@raulizahi
·
2d
The statement is part of a conversation discussing the potential impact of the Trump administration's policies on the American university system and the suggestion of a general strike as a response. This constitutes public discourse as it engages with a significant public issue and suggests a form of civic action.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but suggests a general strike, which could have economic and social implications. It neither aligns nor violates the principle significantly.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on suggesting a course of action.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It is a straightforward expression of opinion. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to suggest a form of protest, which can be seen as an attempt to better society by addressing perceived injustices. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by expressing an opinion on a public issue responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.