The statement is a provocative question aimed at engaging the public on the issue of environmental protection versus corporate profit, specifically related to the Enbridge Line 5 pipeline in Michigan. It encourages readers to consider the long-term environmental impact on the Great Lakes against the economic interests of a foreign oil company.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as polarizing by framing the issue in a binary manner.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy towards environmental concerns by highlighting the importance of protecting the Great Lakes. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but frames the issue in a way that could discourage open dialogue by presenting a dichotomy.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to raise awareness about an important environmental issue, encouraging public engagement and consideration. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly using the platform to discuss a significant public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.