In reply to:
Ben Pielstick
@BenPielstick
·
1d
Ben Adler
@itsbadler
·
1d
Ben Pielstick
@BenPielstick
·
1d
Whole Mars Catalog
@WholeMarsBlog
·
57d
Ben Adler
@itsbadler
·
1d
Harmony Hacker
@HarmonyHacker
·
2d
The statement critiques the reliability of self-driving technology based on limited testing data. It questions the safety claims made about autonomous vehicles, suggesting that a single hour of intervention-free driving is insufficient to ensure safety. The tone is skeptical and challenges the optimism around self-driving technology.
- The statement aims to prevent harm by questioning the safety of self-driving technology, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By questioning the safety claims, the statement encourages a deeper understanding of the technology's limitations, promoting informed discourse. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by challenging the claims made about self-driving technology without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.