The statement addresses a public issue involving alleged censorship at a government institution, which is a matter of public concern. It suggests a conflict between scientific freedom and political influence.
- The statement raises concerns about potential harm caused by censorship, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects the privacy and dignity of others by focusing on institutional issues rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by bringing attention to the issue of censorship in scientific research. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in constructive criticism by highlighting a potential problem within a public institution without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.