Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement criticizes the Democratic Party for allegedly prioritizing appearances over genuine populist policies, suggesting they cater to the donor class. It uses a sarcastic tone to question the authenticity of political figures and their alignment with populist ideals.
- The statement uses sarcasm and could be seen as undermining constructive political dialogue, potentially causing harm by fostering cynicism. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but it does question the integrity of a public figure, which could be seen as disrespectful.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead opting for a sarcastic critique without offering solutions. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.