Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement critiques the policies and actions of past U.S. administrations, specifically in the context of the 'War on Terror,' and draws parallels to current events. It engages in public discourse by addressing issues of civil rights, governmental policies, and historical context.
- The statement does not directly harm others but critiques past policies, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by focusing on public figures and policies rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding by drawing historical parallels, though it could be more empathetic in tone. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of policies rather than personal attacks, aligning with constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight perceived governmental overreach, aiming for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech responsibly by critiquing public policies and actions. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.